I Feel Fairly Comfortable Saying The Mets Would Not Have Won That Game Under This Man
I'm not one to pile on or to live in the past, but the thought that was burning in my brain after last night's thrilling, stirring, amazing, 10-8 victory is that no way, no how, no chance would the Mets have been able to attain such a victory if Willie Randolph was still around. After the Redlegs put up that 5-spot in the 4th, the boys in blue would've packed it in for the night and started thinking about late-night dinner plans and/or whether to order a porno movie in their hotel room before they hit the sack. You know it and I know it.That being said, a few points:
(1) Obviously a 10th consecutive victory is great, but consider that they overcame an absolutely pathetic outing by their putative "ace," two blown leads, and one bullpen meltdown - and still won by two runs. Those are some tremendously good signs.
(2) Let's get this one out of the way. Johan - ugh. He just looked like he wanted to be somewhere else. I'm not in the "concerned" zone yet (his ERA is too good), but a few more like that and I will be.
(3) What an enormous 2-out, 2-RBI hit by D. Wright in the 5th to trim the Reds' lead to 5-4. Those are the type of hits that have been missing for over a year (minus two weeks). Speaking of Wright...
(4) I don't clap and yell while watching regular season games on TV much, but rest assured there was a ruckus going on in Brooklyn when D. Wright's ball cleared the right field fence in the 9th. As usual, my sports-related cheering woke up my pooch who then started running around barking, which is always amusing. I wish you all could've seen her after the Plaxico touchdown in the Super Bowl. She went crazier than I did (and almost got stepped on).
(5) Tatis, I mean, what can you say? He's this year's edition of the 2006 Jose Valentin, isn't he?
Just a great win all around, and I'm finding myself really excited to watch these games now. Something that was unthinkable back when a meager 2 wins in a row supposedly constituted "a nice little roll."
p.s. - Someone on Mets Blog made a great comment that we should refer to a certain two players as "Alouque." Nice. Oh, and I caught Orlando's press conference after his epic Binghamton start. My Spanish is a bit rusty, but I think "ehhhhhhhhh..." means "I'm finished. Please cut me."



10 Comments:
Time to forget about El Duque.
As for last night, two things of note
1. First time Mets won after trailing by 3 runs all season.
2. Reds were 34-1 in games in which they led after 7 innings going into last night.
Timely offense, decent defense (two bad RF plays overshadowed by DW making a great play on the bunt to end it). Nice outings by Dirty and Big Mouth Billy Bass.
I agree, this was a game they do not win a month ago. Heck, maybe not even two weeks. ago.
10:17 AM
you are right.. here's my thoughts
a. Evans would have NEVER pinch hit for Johan in the fifth.
b. Argenis would have NEVER pinch hit in the ninth.
willie would have NEVER given the shot to the two young guys.
12:03 PM
Me thinks Jerry can now use the words "nice little roll" any time he wants. Sugar Pants coming through. Mr. Delgado, welcome back from your stint in the nursing home... simply en fuego.
The Duqe is done. With the latino balance upset by his departure, maybe we can pick up Manny... He pissed off the Boston execs something fierce. Although the other Reyes, and Tatis may be enough to keep the balance. Viva Los Metropolitanistas!
1:57 PM
(6) El Argenis - the man has never lost a game.
3:36 PM
Great post, but I'm not so sure. Cordero was in full-on meltdown mode last night. But the team has seemed more willing to play for Manuel... Let's Go Mets!
4:58 PM
Disagree as WR was managing a team that expected to turn a page & leave him behind; Agree for the same reason.
5:15 PM
I"m just as convinced that Manuel has made no difference, and they would've won that game, and all of these games if Willie, Manuel, or big bird were managing.
and as for biggiesmalls misguided comments, you mean the young guys Manuel is trusting in Tatis and Easley? Didn't Willie trust Evans that first day when he had three triples?
5:15 PM
Ceetar, the Mets are 18-9 since Manuel took over. I'm not saying he's Miller Huggins, but you can't possibly think that's a coincidence. C'mon.
5:22 PM
Ceetar -- the point is Willie would have NEVER relied on Rooks to PINCH HIT in big situations.. theres no denying that.. thats all i was sayin.
6:53 PM
and Evans hit three DOUBLES his first day.. not triples
6:54 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home